The transfer kicked up a furore within the state and reached the doorsteps of the Perfect Court docket which on Thursday refused an pressing listening to on a petition in quest of contempt court cases in opposition to the priest.
Priest Kandaru Rajeevaru carried out the purification rituals hours after two ladies entered the sanctum sanctorum of the temple on Wednesday. They have been the first to enter the temple be offering prayers after Perfect Court docket verdict permitting ladies off alleges to worship on the shrine.
“Being the manager priest, I’m duty-bound to practice the ritualistic practices at Sabarimala,” Rajeevaru instructed The Hindu.
Give up, says Kerala CM
Kerala Leader Minister Pinarayi Vijayan referred to as for the priest to surrender his publish if he may just now not abide the highest courtroom’s orders. “He can individually say I will’t abide through this courtroom order, however then he can not grasp this publish. It’s as much as the Travancore Devaswom Board, whether or not to open or shut the doorways of the temple. The priest’s transfer is not only a contravention of courtroom orders but in addition of TDB regulations,” he mentioned at a press convention on Thursday.
TDB president A Padmakumar instructed Indian Express, “We’re in opposition to the motion of the thantri (priest). Earlier than shutting the temple, he must have consulted the Board, which runs the shrine. As an alternative, he simply referred to as me and mentioned the shrine can be closed for purification and hung up.”
CPI(M) state secretary Kodiyeri Balakrishnan mentioned contempt of courtroom court cases must be initiated in opposition to the priest.
A collective of main writers, intellectuals and academicians — together with MGS Narayanan, Sunil P Ilayidom, Rafeek Ahmed, and Okay Satchidanandan — has referred to as for felony motion in opposition to the priest. “By way of recognising it as a contempt of courtroom and very casteist in nature, we call for that the federal government take important felony motion in opposition to the manager,” the collective’s statement said.
Priest 100% proper, says Congress
The chief of the opposition, Congress’s Ramesh Chennithala mentioned the access of the ladies into the shrine “harm” the emotions of devotees. Backing the priest, he mentioned the closure of the temple for the purification rite was once “100% proper”.
In the meantime, the Nair Provider Society, which has filed a evaluation petition in opposition to the SC verdict thanked the priest. “On behalf of devotees, I lengthen my gratitude to the thantri and royal households for starting up steps to near the sanctorum and for undertaking remedial measures,” NSS common secretary G Sukumaran Nair mentioned.
What the SC verdict says
In his observations within the SC verdict, Justice DY Chandrachud had referred to as the ban on ladies of menstruating age “a form of untouchability”.
“The stigma round menstruation has been constructed up round conventional ideals within the impurity of menstruating ladies. They’ve no position in a constitutional order. Those ideals were used to shackle ladies, to disclaim them equivalent entitlements and matter them to the dictates of a patriarchal order. The menstrual standing of a lady can’t be a legitimate constitutional foundation to disclaim her the consideration of being and the autonomy of personhood. The menstrual standing of a lady is deeply private and an intrinsic a part of her privateness. The Charter should deal with it as a function at the foundation of which no exclusion may also be practised and no denial may also be perpetrated. No frame or team can use it as a barrier in a lady’s quest for fulfilment, together with in her discovering solace within the hook up with the writer,” he mentioned.
“To regard ladies as kids of a lesser god is to blink at constitutional morality,” he added.